NEW Experience outstanding D-SLR image quality with 24.2 effective megapixels Nikon makes outstanding image quality possible with the perfect combination of technological advances: a newly developed Nikon DX-format CMOS image sensor, Nikon's exclusive new EXPEED 4 image-processing engine, Picture Control, and the uncompromising optical quality of NIKKOR lenses.
![]()
(unknown member)I'm looking at DSLR's for the first time and I'm trying to understand the issue with using 'Live View' in the Nikon D5xxx cameras.I want to use the LCD screen to compose images, and I was expecting these cameras to show any adjustments in shutter, aperture and ISO on the LCD screen before I take the image.On the 'CONS' side of the review for the Nikon D5200 it says there is, 'No real-time aperture adjustment in live view.' So, that means that you cannot see adjustments made to the aperture settings in the LCD before you take the shot, right?Is that true for the other Nikon DSLR's?
Is that true of any other DSLR cameras?I'm sure this issue has been addressed before. Sorry for the redundancy. So is the D7xxx series. So, it boils down to your budget and your affinity to upgrade. If you don't want to upgrade often, D5300 should last you for a few years. If you can stretch it a little, would suggest to go for a D7xxx series camera (D7100 and above) you will get similar functions as a full frame and some more. Eventually if you do move to a full frame, you will feel at home.Also, you need to buy lenses (AF-S) with auto focus motor in them, to avoid manual focus on the 3xxx and 5xxx series.
These cost more than the AF lenses.The D5300 is a good camera to own and use, though. You can spend that money on some quality lenses. That will take you some distance. Another suggestion avoid DX lenses, if you do want to upgrade to a full frame eventually. Same lens can be used. Hello,what am 'I doing wrong?I have a D5300 (new) and used Nikkor AF-S 18-200 VR (first version).
I bought this camera because I was not happy with my Lumix GH1 low light stills capabilities AND because - reading THIS review - I thought the video capabilities should be OK for me as amateur point and shoot family father.But for me (no rigs, no external mic) it is unusable because the autofocus is too loud for the internal mic and because the focus is not smooth (needs several iteration to focus). And I do not want to focus manually on my moving children.Example: If I move slowly around a room (in continuos AF mode) the AF will be in continuos motion, needing several iterations to focus (on an object 3meters away you can see the focus scale on the lens going at least two times between infinity and 1meter until it focusses), and always generating that zzzt - zzzt - noise that is messing up the video.Do I need other settings, lens, camera?Thanks for productive feedback. If you're more comfortable having the U.S warranty, you can buy the identical camera with 2 year U.S.
Warranty for about $200 more. Regarding lenses, if I had to choose only one lens, it would undoubtably be the 35mm/f1.8 VR. This fixed (prime) lens gives you the wide aperture to shoot in low light with no flash. It produces photos that are most like what the eyes see in real life.I chose the 55-200mm/f3.5-5.6 VR as a good 'carry around' lens for shooting short, medium, and longer fields of view - and of course that lovely 'bokeh' effect (blurry background, sharp subject).
Also, importantly, this lens weighs about 11.4 oz - half the weight (and price) of the 18-200mm. 18-200mm is about 1.2 lbs/20 oz. And about $550 retail. Incidentally, the 55-200 is actually 82.5-300mm (full format equivalent).continued. I've never been happier with a new camera, than I am with my Nikon D5300. I've been a shutterbug for decades, and there is little reason to spend more for an all-around fantastic camera. Ignore categories like entry level/pro, etc when considering a camera of this quality.
It's the photographer and lenses that produce great photos.I got the camera body for $499 (with no U.S. Warranty) from RedTag Camera in Brooklyn, NY. After adding a Nikon/Nikkor 35mm/f1.8 VR prime lens ($139) and a 32gb card, filters, extra battery, macro/zoom attachments, camera bag, etc - then a refurbished 55-200mm VR Nikkor lens from the Nikon site ($119), my total was $850.Continued. Can anyone enlighten me as I am going to purchase a new DSLR for me. I am a motorcyclist who ride a lot in mountains and countryside, and require a good camera which can shoot good pics.
I have in my mind a Canon D60 (Old and proven but also heard a lot about its durability) and a Nikon D5300 a latest in the series. I used to use a point and shoot camera before but its not sufficient anymore.
I also checked and found that Canon has a inbuilt motor and Nikon don't have so lens with motors are required for Nikon. Please advise.
(unknown member)Nikon cameras are as good if not better than the competition. I have had the D90, D600 and am currently using the D5100 as my everyday camera and the D800 for more serious photo.
The D5300 follows the D5200, hence, is the third iteration to my D5100.Without knowing your experience in photography and your budget to this purchase. I limit answer SPECIFICALLY to your question:YES, the Nikon D5300 is a VERY GOOD camera.If you provide relevant information about your photography experience, your intended use, then I would help you decide the alternatives.
Hi ecube,I already own a Bridge camera, namely Sony DSC HX300 (with 50X zoom) that takes pretty good and impressive pics. However, I am looking for a DSLR now. I don't have a massive budget, and I mainly take nature and wildlife shots.
I don't really do portraits or fashion or food.Technically, I am not great when it comes to a DSLR. I need a good camera that offers a good low light condition.I have some models in my mind- Nikon D5100 / 5200 / 5300 / 3300 and Canon EOS 600D / 60DI can afford upto Nikon D5200 (in terms of money) without straining myself much. Kindly suggest me a good camera (from or beyond the list I provided) that fills my requirement as sated. I just bought a D5300 and it's a perfect camera except for lack of in built motor, CLS (commander mode), and Auto FP sync. I can't get over this whole 'going pro' statements I'm seeing below. I just want the lightest camera with full features.
D7100 doesn't even offer wifi, gps, articulated screen, or 60p video. What's the upgrade path if I need all these 4 things for someone who's used a DSLR since 2008? I hate how Nikon calls this camera a beginner's tool.
It's absolutely ridiculous. I really, really need 60p video for slow motion shots. To upgrade to full frame would not make sense.
To go to D7100 is not going 'pro', it's a downgrade for me. People here are so dense, and don't look at the big picture. D7100 is using a expeed 3 processor with slower processing.
My D5300 can skim through pictures in milliseconds. Nikon, please rethink the upgrade path in your camera line. It makes no sense as of July 28th, 2014. (unknown member)@shirmphead - NO, you are NOT a 'shirmphead'. Your comment make very good points.
Before I buy ANY major purchase, I research the items and alternatives. My experience in photography dates back to late 1950s.
My experience with Digital photography started in 2001 with a simple Point & Shoot. Bought my first state of the art serious DSLR in 2004, the Nikon D90. At that time, it was considered a PRO camera. My next Nikon purchase maybe called either an upgrade or downgrade, I don't care either way, was the D5100. Followed by a D600 and now a D800. The D5100 is my everyday camera.
![]()
Despite all the very good features and very good results this D5100 has going for it, it is still a mid-level DSLR.With that said, I am not offended by the terms 'beginners camera', entry level, mid-level, enthusiast level, pro-level designation. I suggest you shrug-off the terms because it does not mean anything. What matter is the enjoyment you get from making the shots that matters to you. (unknown member)YES but only in MANUAL mode.Caveat: If the lens has the meter mating fork, remove that fork.I have Nikkor lenses circa 1976 and I use those lenses on my Nikon D5100, D600 and D800 -all in MANUAL mode only. Goggle NIKON lens compatibly and you will see matrix of Nikkor lenses and Nikon bodies compatibility table.The letter D following the f/number suggests your lens has a hole that house the slot of the screw head that mate with the spade of the high-end Nikon DSLR. I don't think the D5300 has that spade to drive the autofocus gears of the lens.
I tried the Canon 700d, Nikon D7100 and others but decided on a D5300 after much deliberation. I went for the 18-140 as a size/range compromise. The camera has been great and has exceeded my expectations. It is nicely weighty and feels better made than the competition. The lack of buttons compared to the D7100 and touch screen compared to the Canon has not bothered me. I use the camera in the 'old fashioned' way and have it up to my face most of the time. I find the button position to be ideal.
I have two fingers on the right side top for shutter and exposure adjustment and on the left side I have one on the FN button which is assigned to ISO which I can adjust on the fly.I use a 2 sec regularly in low light but the camera is set to 10. It isn't in the manual but I found it in a menu and 2 secs is now my default. The low light performance at high ISOs is better than I expected. Check the DXO Mark website for comparisons with other makes. Overall I am very pleased with my D5300. These are the lenses I finally decided upon:1. For everyday, the new Sigma 1.8 18 to 35.
I have had no trouble with the autofocus on this lens. Compared to every other lens out there, this lens delivers just incredibly sharp detail, and its ability to go to 1.8 f makes the camera useable for indoor low light shots. For wide angle get the tokina 11-16 2.8 that just came out. $525.These two lenses will take your photography to levels you won't believe until you see.I have not yet found a long end lens that equals these. For the time being, the 18-140 nikon is probably the best choice.(I have it but rarely use it because of how much I like the sigma.). I am graduating from a bridge camera to a DSLR.
Have been a hobby photographer for many years primarily doing landscape photography but I do it only when on a vacation that would be twice a year. I was a little confused whether to buy a Canon 700D or a Nikon D5300. I have always used Canon cameras before and after going thru many reviews comparing the two cameras I am not wiser. I also understand that once one buys a DSLR one continues to buy cameras of that family so that it can save money on lenses. Assuming that the quality of photos is not much different in the two cameras is the touch screen in 700D so useful that I should buy a Canon or the WIFI-GPS so important in the Nikon. As there anything else that help me decide between the two. Your advice would be most helpful.Tx.
You can reply directly on my mail - [email protected].
![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |